What the numbers say
The current site does not clear the bar — and the fix the numbers point to is a rent structure change, not more sales effort. At stable sales (~$31K/month) and the current rent ($9,200/month), the owner's draw runs at roughly a third of the floor she named. The gap is structural, not seasonal.
It is a rent problem, not a demand problem. Sales have held within 4% for three years while rent rose 40%. At the Corner Site's quoted rent, the same sales clear the draw floor without any growth.
The stay-or-close binary is false. Between "make this site work" and "close the shop" sits a real option space — six paths that combine and sequence rather than compete. The map below is the resolution of this read: the recommendation, rendered spatially.
How the paths combine
Confidence — two kinds
Two kinds of confidence appear here and never sit on the same scale: confidence that a move is the right next move (a relative judgment across options) and confidence that a path clears the bar (an absolute prediction that depends on an unsigned lease and an uncharged membership list).
The first stage, over the alternatives
A relative judgment across the option space — which move is right to run next, not whether it will work.
~70%
that the combined first stage — move + memberships + co-tenancy — is the right next move over the alternatives.The hatched block carries the "~": a judgment call, read in coarse steps.
SCALE A — RELATIVE · COARSE STEPS · NOT COMPARABLE TO SCALE B
Draw floor sustained 12 months
Absolute predictions that the $3,800/month draw holds for a full year — each read against the same 0–100 rail.
The combination — move + memberships + co-tenancy
~50–55% — genuinely uncertain; rendered as a range because that is what it is.
The residual is almost entirely the unsigned lease and the uncharged membership list.
The Corner Site move alone — no memberships, no co-tenant
~35%
Staying at the current site as-is — the baseline
~10%
Confidence in the "not viable as-is" read itself: ~85%.
SCALE B — ABSOLUTE · 0–100 RAIL · NOT COMPARABLE TO SCALE A
OPEN DECISION — THE MEMBERSHIP FLOOR
floor: paying members by March 1 — the owner's to set.
The number of paying members that counts as "the program works." Discussion has ranged 60–120, but no value here is a default or a suggestion. The escalation condition above reads against this floor once it is set.
Path index
Behind this page
The rent arithmetic
What each site costs against each membership level — and why no row at the current rent clears the draw floor.
OPEN → DOOR IIThe held tensions
The living-room tension — the shop as the neighborhood's free civic space vs. the owner's pay — and the co-op timing tension — telling the staff too early reads as an exit announcement; too late, and the interested staff may have moved on. Held, not resolved, with what would settle each.
OPEN → DOOR IIIWhat this can't see
The landlord's actual intentions, the neighborhood's five-year trajectory, and whether the owner still wants the shop at all — taken as given here, not established.
OPEN →